About
Thousands of CTS graduates are out in the world doing amazing, important things. These courageous men and women are working to change society and elevate humanity in bold new ways. Their on-going work is our greatest legacy.
main

User Rating: 0 / 5

Star inactiveStar inactiveStar inactiveStar inactiveStar inactive
 

All I Want for Christmas. . .

While the old holiday song suggests that children might want two front teeth for Christmas, this year I’d like to suggest an alternative: “All I want for Christmas is a teacher.” Sunday’s New York Times* reported the stark impact of the recent recession on schools, namely, the massive loss of public school teachers since 2008. According to Labor Department statistics, public schools across the country employ 250,000 fewer people today than they did prior to the recession. Meanwhile, pupil enrollment has grown by 800,000 students. To maintain pre-recession staffing ratios, public schools nation-wide would have had to add 132,000 jobs.

What does this look like in the classroom? In Coatesville, Pennsylvania, a declining steel town forty miles outside of Philadelphia, the professional workforce of 600 prior to the recession has been cut by twenty percent. This means that some of the thirty students in one fourth grade class sit halfway into a coat closet. In a middle school social studies class one teacher handles twenty-five students, ten with special education needs, four who know little or no English, and several others who need advanced work to stay engaged. He used to have two aides to help; not any more.

All of this suggests to me that what children may really want for Christmas is a teacher! Think how much better a teacher would be as a Christmas gift than an expensive doll or a pricey electronic game.

  1. Toys get broken or discarded within months; a teacher will last for a lifetime. How many of us remember the gifted teacher who made a difference in our lives? Teachers truly are the gift that keeps on giving.
  2. Teachers really are “educational.” We love to label toys “educational.” It makes parents feel less guilty or anxious spending money at Toys R Us.  But marketing can’t really make a toy anything other than a toy. A teacher, however, is not entertainment dressed up as education. A teacher is education, through and through.
  3. Teachers don’t need batteries. They come with amazing energy born of their passion for children. Of course, some do burn out, losing the spark that called them to this vocation. But that’s usually because no one took care of them and supported them, or because public policies have forced them to become test administrators rather than educators, or because politicians and so-called reformers have created a demeaning drum beat about them, blaming them for the fact that our poorest children struggle to learn. But take care of a teacher and he or she will hum along for a long, productive career.
  4. Toys don’t love the children who play with them. But teachers do. In one Chicago school this year the principal and teachers bought Christmas presents for their neediest pupils to ensure that everyone had a present. And they did this out of their own pockets! It’s a tradition that’s been going on for years. How’s that for a value added gift? A gift that not only children love, but that loves children back!

Of course, not all parents can afford to give their children a teacher for Christmas. They can’t send their children to an elite private school, or they live in a poor school district where low and declining property values depress school budgets, particularly in harsh economic times. Thirty-five miles from Coatesville the affluent Lower Merion School district has been able to increase its property taxes every year since 2008. Class sizes remain in the low to mid-twenties and elementary students get to study a foreign language. Coatesville and towns like it don’t get the press that Philadelphia or Cleveland or Chicago do for their draconian school budget crises. But there are more and more Coatesville’s today in an economy increasingly divided into winners and losers.

Some think the answer is cheaper teachers. Privatize the public school system with so-called public charter schools and you can circumvent teachers’ unions, paying far below professional standards. Or bring in a bunch of bright, enthusiastic college graduates willing to work hard for less in programs like “Teach for America.” While their zeal for service in poor districts may be laudable, the fact is they have no real training beyond a short orientation, no education degrees, and are able to teach only because the federal government waives the normal certification requirements. And, like cheap toys, cheap teachers don’t last long. Cheap teachers come and go, depriving children of the quality one expects from teachers who are well trained and who have years of teaching experience.

This year many of our children, whether they know it or not, want – and need – a teacher for Christmas. But unless our priorities change, unless we radically rethink how we allocate resources for all of our public schools, and unless we begin to recognize the real value of highly trained, well paid, experienced teachers, many of our children will find little more than the proverbial coal in their stockings.

By the way, the song “All I Want for Christmas” was written in 1944 by a public school music teacher who had asked his second grade pupils what they wanted for Christmas. He noticed that almost all of the students answered with a lisp because they had at least one front tooth missing. Chances are Donald Gardner wouldn’t be teaching these days. More and more school districts are laying off their music and art teachers, their guidance counselors, librarians and nurses. Local property taxes simply won’t provide this crucial component of a full education. And programs like Obama’s “Race for the Top,” on which much federal funding is based, don’t test whether children are learning how to sing or play a musical instrument. That’s more than sad in this merry season.

John H. Thomas
Christmas, 2013

*http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/22/education/subtract-teachers-add-pupils-math-of-todays-jammed-schools.html?_r=0

People in this conversation

  • WOW... Wonderful blog post. As Two-TeacherZ in the public schools for over 20 years each we wanted to convey to you just how touched we were by your prose. Additionally, we wanted to comment that the recession has negatively impacted every public school. In Michigan where we're employed the decreased public funding hurts affluent suburb public schools as it also does intercity public schools. Our class sizes, in a reputable public suburb school, exceed those mentioned in your blog post. I work with 12-14 special education students in each of my non-honors classes without a teaching assistant. The 1st grade classes of my wife have been over 25 students the past 6 years. Last year she worked with 28 students and two were special needs. No public school is blanketed from the ill-conceived budgetary priorities of those in power distributing educational funding. Again, thank you for your support of education, public schools, teachers and our nations most important resource: our children.

  • Guest (Karen Smith Sellers)

    Permalink

    I regret that John Thomas chose this blog post to denigrate Teach for America, an organization that agrees wholeheartedly with his conviction about the importance of a quality teacher and is driven by a concern for educational inequities.
    Likening TFA teachers to “cheap toys” is both inaccurate and insulting. TFA teachers must be licensed by the state in which they teach and, when hired by the public schools, are compensated at the same rate as other entry-level teachers and join the local teachers union. It is worth noting as well that half of all teachers teach less than five years and that TFA teachers are actually less likely to leave urban and low-income school districts (http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/10/04/kappan_donaldson.html).
    Moreover, the most recent and rigorous studies show that TFA corps members help their students achieve academic gains equal to or larger than teachers from other preparation programs (http://www.teachforamerica.org/our organization/research). This suggests that a child who received a TFA teacher for Christmas would not get the “proverbial coal in their stockings” but rather would receive the quality, transforming teaching they so richly deserve.
    Most teachers, teacher unions, educational policy makers, educational reformers, and (yes) John Thomas share a common goal that “all children in this nation will have an opportunity to attain an excellent education” (TFA mission). There are, to be sure, honest disagreements about the strategies for achieving this purpose. Indeed, The New York Times article (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/22/education/subtract-teachers-add-pupils-math-of-todays-jammed-schools.html?_r=1&), which Thomas cites, states clearly that research on the importance of class size in helping students learn (the solution proposed by some) is mixed. So is the research about the impact on student learning that results from allocating more money to public education.
    Because this is an enormously complicated issue and on behalf of the children who so clearly do deserve a passionate, quality and committed teacher (not only at/for Christmas but every other day of the year as well), I encourage those who share a commitment to educational equity and quality to take a confessional and collaborative approach to addressing this challenge. And I give thanks for all the bright young TFA corps members, many of whose faith convictions moved them to serve through TFA and who have been a priceless gift to their students.
    Rev. Dr. Karen Smith Sellers
    Retired UCC Conference Minister

Leave your comments

0
terms and condition.